<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: London Google Earth 1690	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2006/01/25/london-google-earth-1690-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2006/01/25/london-google-earth-1690-2/</link>
	<description>Data, Cities, IoT, Writing, Music and Making Things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2012 10:28:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Unknown		</title>
		<link>https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2006/01/25/london-google-earth-1690-2/#comment-188</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Unknown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2012 10:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalurban.net/?p=2435#comment-188</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sorry to comment on such an old post, but just found this and was wondering is that Blackfriars Bridge on the map? What&#039;s it doing on a 1690 map if it wouldn&#039;t be built for another 60 years (http://tinyurl.com/cyou35f)? Was there a previous incarnation of the bridge?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks for the great layer!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to comment on such an old post, but just found this and was wondering is that Blackfriars Bridge on the map? What&#8217;s it doing on a 1690 map if it wouldn&#8217;t be built for another 60 years (<a href="http://tinyurl.com/cyou35f" rel="nofollow ugc">http://tinyurl.com/cyou35f</a>)? Was there a previous incarnation of the bridge?</p>
<p>Thanks for the great layer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Actos		</title>
		<link>https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2006/01/25/london-google-earth-1690-2/#comment-187</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Actos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 18:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalurban.net/?p=2435#comment-187</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[nice post, it&#039;s really interesting for me today, thx]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice post, it&#8217;s really interesting for me today, thx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2006/01/25/london-google-earth-1690-2/#comment-186</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 14:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalurban.net/?p=2435#comment-186</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is great!!  I did some small, very isolated QT movies of this sort of thing of Paris a few years ago.  But all I could do was to continually replay them.  How do you make a GE overlay?  I have a huge and very detailed six panel 18th engraved map of Paris would like to try to...&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;R Chenoweth]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great!!  I did some small, very isolated QT movies of this sort of thing of Paris a few years ago.  But all I could do was to continually replay them.  How do you make a GE overlay?  I have a huge and very detailed six panel 18th engraved map of Paris would like to try to&#8230;</p>
<p>R Chenoweth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Frank Taylor		</title>
		<link>https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2006/01/25/london-google-earth-1690-2/#comment-185</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank Taylor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 04:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalurban.net/?p=2435#comment-185</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I manipulated your overlay slightly to what I think is a more accurate position.  Check this out:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gearthblog.com/kmfiles/london1609.kmz&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;London1609.kmz&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I manipulated your overlay slightly to what I think is a more accurate position.  Check this out:  <a href="http://www.gearthblog.com/kmfiles/london1609.kmz" rel="nofollow ugc">London1609.kmz</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dan Hill		</title>
		<link>https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2006/01/25/london-google-earth-1690-2/#comment-183</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Hill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalurban.net/?p=2435#comment-183</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Beautiful, Andrew. That&#039;s fantastic. I just &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cityofsound.com/blog/2006/01/two_possible_go.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;posted a speculative piece around this idea&lt;/a&gt;, completely unaware of your work here, and a colleague pinged to alert me! Great stuff.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beautiful, Andrew. That&#8217;s fantastic. I just <a href="http://www.cityofsound.com/blog/2006/01/two_possible_go.html" rel="nofollow ugc">posted a speculative piece around this idea</a>, completely unaware of your work here, and a colleague pinged to alert me! Great stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
