<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: ArcGIS Explorer &#8211; Facade Mapping and Intergrated Analysis Tools	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2006/02/25/arcgis-explorer-facade-mapping-and/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2006/02/25/arcgis-explorer-facade-mapping-and/</link>
	<description>Data, Cities, IoT, Writing, Music and Making Things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 20:32:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Q		</title>
		<link>https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2006/02/25/arcgis-explorer-facade-mapping-and/#comment-258</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Q]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 20:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalurban.net/?p=2422#comment-258</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Good write up Dave!&lt;br /&gt;One thing about Google earth is its security! &lt;br /&gt;We thought of using gogle earth in office but decided not to after much consideration.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We are trying to incorporate scriptings into Arc Explorer, which I feel is okay too!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Nicely said!&lt;br /&gt;~Queen]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good write up Dave!<br />One thing about Google earth is its security! <br />We thought of using gogle earth in office but decided not to after much consideration.</p>
<p>We are trying to incorporate scriptings into Arc Explorer, which I feel is okay too!</p>
<p>Nicely said!<br />~Queen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mitch W.		</title>
		<link>https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2006/02/25/arcgis-explorer-facade-mapping-and/#comment-256</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mitch W.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 18:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalurban.net/?p=2422#comment-256</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[KMZ is supported but my GE KMZ&#039;s (exported from RockWork&#039;s) are corrupted. It may be that AE doesn&#039;t support as large an amount of Collda data as GE.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KMZ is supported but my GE KMZ&#8217;s (exported from RockWork&#8217;s) are corrupted. It may be that AE doesn&#8217;t support as large an amount of Collda data as GE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mitch		</title>
		<link>https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2006/02/25/arcgis-explorer-facade-mapping-and/#comment-253</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mitch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 18:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalurban.net/?p=2422#comment-253</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It loads KMZ&#039;s but doesn&#039;t seem to display them correctly. The KMZ Export from RockWork&#039;s look fine in GE but are corrupted in Explorer. Perhaps the limits for the embedded Collada files are smaller than GE&#039;s.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It loads KMZ&#8217;s but doesn&#8217;t seem to display them correctly. The KMZ Export from RockWork&#8217;s look fine in GE but are corrupted in Explorer. Perhaps the limits for the embedded Collada files are smaller than GE&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2006/02/25/arcgis-explorer-facade-mapping-and/#comment-251</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 19:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalurban.net/?p=2422#comment-251</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[AE is an interesting tool, but don&#039;t dump your GE mashups yet.  The tester community has been challenged by the first AE beta - blue screens and no answer from data servers.  The first viable AE version might not appear until August . . .]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AE is an interesting tool, but don&#8217;t dump your GE mashups yet.  The tester community has been challenged by the first AE beta &#8211; blue screens and no answer from data servers.  The first viable AE version might not appear until August . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Smithee		</title>
		<link>https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2006/02/25/arcgis-explorer-facade-mapping-and/#comment-249</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smithee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 13:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalurban.net/?p=2422#comment-249</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Arc Explorer has import KML/KMZ as a key part in the Interface so yes its supported.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Its not known if it will support the Network Link function but a emphasis was made on the importance of Network Sharing so I&#039;m assuming it will.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Andy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arc Explorer has import KML/KMZ as a key part in the Interface so yes its supported.</p>
<p>Its not known if it will support the Network Link function but a emphasis was made on the importance of Network Sharing so I&#8217;m assuming it will.</p>
<p>Andy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2006/02/25/arcgis-explorer-facade-mapping-and/#comment-247</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 19:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalurban.net/?p=2422#comment-247</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Good to know what is up with Arc Explorer Andy.  Do you know if it will except KML/KMZ files? Or are we going to have to *trash* all of those files for yet another protocol. ESRI would really get alot more attention if all the existing KML files would work in Arc Explorer.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;D.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to know what is up with Arc Explorer Andy.  Do you know if it will except KML/KMZ files? Or are we going to have to *trash* all of those files for yet another protocol. ESRI would really get alot more attention if all the existing KML files would work in Arc Explorer.</p>
<p>D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2006/02/25/arcgis-explorer-facade-mapping-and/#comment-245</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 19:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalurban.net/?p=2422#comment-245</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Good to know what is up with Arc Explorer Andy.  Do you know if it will except KML/KMZ files? Or are we going to have to *trash* all of those files for yet another protocol. ESRI would really get alot more attention if all the existing KML files would work in Arc Explorer.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;D.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to know what is up with Arc Explorer Andy.  Do you know if it will except KML/KMZ files? Or are we going to have to *trash* all of those files for yet another protocol. ESRI would really get alot more attention if all the existing KML files would work in Arc Explorer.</p>
<p>D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2006/02/25/arcgis-explorer-facade-mapping-and/#comment-244</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 08:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalurban.net/?p=2422#comment-244</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[nice write up of arc explorer andy - all this stuff promises to enable professional planners and the public at large in ways that we have all been hoping for since computers first held out the prospect of communicating issuesa about cities to a wider public - mike]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice write up of arc explorer andy &#8211; all this stuff promises to enable professional planners and the public at large in ways that we have all been hoping for since computers first held out the prospect of communicating issuesa about cities to a wider public &#8211; mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
