<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Editing the Template	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2007/01/11/editing-template/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2007/01/11/editing-template/</link>
	<description>Data, Cities, IoT, Writing, Music and Making Things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Andy		</title>
		<link>https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2007/01/11/editing-template/#comment-978</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalurban.net/?p=2246#comment-978</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the comments Joe, glad you like the site :)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As for the design its not going down well is it.. I&#039;ve removed the top adverts now as it was beginning to look far to &#039;ad&#039; driven which its not, hopefully its about original content.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&#039;ve also extended the logo to pull the design in slightly.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The reason for the change was the old site was a classic blogger template and my site looked the same as many other blogs, i also wasn’t too keen on the green to be honest.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Still.. any more comments are of course welcome...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Andy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments Joe, glad you like the site 🙂</p>
<p>As for the design its not going down well is it.. I&#8217;ve removed the top adverts now as it was beginning to look far to &#8216;ad&#8217; driven which its not, hopefully its about original content.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also extended the logo to pull the design in slightly.</p>
<p>The reason for the change was the old site was a classic blogger template and my site looked the same as many other blogs, i also wasn’t too keen on the green to be honest.</p>
<p>Still.. any more comments are of course welcome&#8230;</p>
<p>Andy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Joe		</title>
		<link>https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2007/01/11/editing-template/#comment-977</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalurban.net/?p=2246#comment-977</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I really liked the old look, the new one is a bit &#039;Google&#039; and as Carl said, it isn&#039;t as easy visually to pick out the articles from the ads.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, this is a good opportunity to thank you for a great site. I have no professional or technical interest in 3D, modelling, urban geography etc but wish I did after following the blog for the last couple of months!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really liked the old look, the new one is a bit &#8216;Google&#8217; and as Carl said, it isn&#8217;t as easy visually to pick out the articles from the ads.</p>
<p>However, this is a good opportunity to thank you for a great site. I have no professional or technical interest in 3D, modelling, urban geography etc but wish I did after following the blog for the last couple of months!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ian Mansfield		</title>
		<link>https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2007/01/11/editing-template/#comment-976</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian Mansfield]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 08:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalurban.net/?p=2246#comment-976</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s half way there.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I prefer the cleaner look - but it needs a little more structure to the postings to split them up - maybe a thin border around them.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ironically, this postings page is a lot easier to read ;)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s half way there.</p>
<p>I prefer the cleaner look &#8211; but it needs a little more structure to the postings to split them up &#8211; maybe a thin border around them.</p>
<p>Ironically, this postings page is a lot easier to read 😉</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Andy		</title>
		<link>https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2007/01/11/editing-template/#comment-975</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalurban.net/?p=2246#comment-975</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve changed the link colour.. its not looking good for the new layout is it!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve changed the link colour.. its not looking good for the new layout is it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2007/01/11/editing-template/#comment-974</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalurban.net/?p=2246#comment-974</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Liked the old version. Right now when I am looking at your page from firefox the links are neither underlined nor a different color from the rest of the text. I can only tell that text is a link if I mouseover it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liked the old version. Right now when I am looking at your page from firefox the links are neither underlined nor a different color from the rest of the text. I can only tell that text is a link if I mouseover it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2007/01/11/editing-template/#comment-973</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalurban.net/?p=2246#comment-973</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The old version was much easier to read. This one looks quite untidy.&lt;br /&gt;I was still waiting for it to load up for ages.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Great site though. I pop through each day.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The old version was much easier to read. This one looks quite untidy.<br />I was still waiting for it to load up for ages.</p>
<p>Great site though. I pop through each day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Andy		</title>
		<link>https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2007/01/11/editing-template/#comment-972</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalurban.net/?p=2246#comment-972</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A vote for the old version then.. &lt;br /&gt; Luckly i saved the old template so its easy to put back.. :)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Anymore views?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A vote for the old version then.. <br /> Luckly i saved the old template so its easy to put back.. 🙂</p>
<p>Anymore views?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Carl Ahearne		</title>
		<link>https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2007/01/11/editing-template/#comment-971</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carl Ahearne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalurban.net/?p=2246#comment-971</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Andy, &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Personally, I preferred the old look; it was easier to read, and the distinction between different elements was more clear.. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Anyway, still a big fan of the site; I am in the 3D modelling industry so it&#039;s good to keep up with current and future technology..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Carl Ahearne]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andy, </p>
<p>Personally, I preferred the old look; it was easier to read, and the distinction between different elements was more clear.. </p>
<p>Anyway, still a big fan of the site; I am in the 3D modelling industry so it&#8217;s good to keep up with current and future technology..</p>
<p>Carl Ahearne</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
