<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Sony GPS Review &#8211; GeoTag Your Photos in the City?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2007/03/13/sony-gps-review-geotag-your-photos-in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2007/03/13/sony-gps-review-geotag-your-photos-in/</link>
	<description>Data, Cities, IoT, Writing, Music and Making Things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 09:51:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2007/03/13/sony-gps-review-geotag-your-photos-in/#comment-1064</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 09:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalurban.net/?p=2197#comment-1064</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Speaking about “geotagging”: do you know locr?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;locr offers the ideal solution and makes geotagging exceptionally easy. locr uses GoogleMaps with detailed maps and high-resolution satellite images. To geotag your photos just enter address, let locr search, fine-tune the marker, accept position, and done! If you don’t know the exact address simply use drag&amp;drop to set the position.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;For automatic geotagging you need a datalog GPS receiver in additon to your digital camera. The GPS receiver data and the digital camera data is then automatically linked together by the locr software. All information will be written into the EXIF header.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;With locr you can upload photos with GPS information in them without any further settings. In the standard view, locr shows the photo itself, plus the place it was taken. If you want to know more about the place where the photo was taken, just have at look at the Wikipedia articles which are also automatically assigned to the picture.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Have a look at www.locr.com.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking about “geotagging”: do you know locr?</p>
<p>locr offers the ideal solution and makes geotagging exceptionally easy. locr uses GoogleMaps with detailed maps and high-resolution satellite images. To geotag your photos just enter address, let locr search, fine-tune the marker, accept position, and done! If you don’t know the exact address simply use drag&#038;drop to set the position.</p>
<p>For automatic geotagging you need a datalog GPS receiver in additon to your digital camera. The GPS receiver data and the digital camera data is then automatically linked together by the locr software. All information will be written into the EXIF header.</p>
<p>With locr you can upload photos with GPS information in them without any further settings. In the standard view, locr shows the photo itself, plus the place it was taken. If you want to know more about the place where the photo was taken, just have at look at the Wikipedia articles which are also automatically assigned to the picture.</p>
<p>Have a look at <a href="http://www.locr.com" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.locr.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rog		</title>
		<link>https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2007/03/13/sony-gps-review-geotag-your-photos-in/#comment-1062</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 04:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalurban.net/?p=2197#comment-1062</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Let&#039;s not mince words.  Apart from the software (for which alternatives exist), this doodad is nothing but an overpriced, low-powered, sony  (huck-ptooey) branded GPS data logger, with less functionality than regular handheld GPSrs had 5 years ago.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s not mince words.  Apart from the software (for which alternatives exist), this doodad is nothing but an overpriced, low-powered, sony  (huck-ptooey) branded GPS data logger, with less functionality than regular handheld GPSrs had 5 years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: evolve		</title>
		<link>https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2007/03/13/sony-gps-review-geotag-your-photos-in/#comment-1061</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[evolve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 17:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalurban.net/?p=2197#comment-1061</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I concur with your findings. I&#039;ve tried to use one of these for geotagging photographs and for openstreetmap work. The accuracy is nowhere near as good as I get with my four year old Magellan. Nice looks, shame about the performance.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I concur with your findings. I&#8217;ve tried to use one of these for geotagging photographs and for openstreetmap work. The accuracy is nowhere near as good as I get with my four year old Magellan. Nice looks, shame about the performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: evolve		</title>
		<link>https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2007/03/13/sony-gps-review-geotag-your-photos-in/#comment-1063</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[evolve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 17:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalurban.net/?p=2197#comment-1063</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I concur with your findings. I&#039;ve tried to use one of these for geotagging photographs and for openstreetmap work. The accuracy is nowhere near as good as I get with my four year old Magellan. Nice looks, shame about the performance.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I concur with your findings. I&#8217;ve tried to use one of these for geotagging photographs and for openstreetmap work. The accuracy is nowhere near as good as I get with my four year old Magellan. Nice looks, shame about the performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
