<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Google Earth GigaPan: Disappointing (?)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2007/08/23/google-earth-gigapan-disappointing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2007/08/23/google-earth-gigapan-disappointing/</link>
	<description>Data, Cities, IoT, Writing, Music and Making Things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 16:19:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: LRG		</title>
		<link>https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2007/08/23/google-earth-gigapan-disappointing/#comment-1841</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LRG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 16:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalurban.net/?p=1970#comment-1841</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[nice]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: phil		</title>
		<link>https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2007/08/23/google-earth-gigapan-disappointing/#comment-1839</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[phil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 00:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalurban.net/?p=1970#comment-1839</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I tried &lt;a href=&quot;http://panovoyant.blogspot.com/2007/08/ge-photooverlays-with-panoramic-spheres.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;combining one of your panoramic spheres with a PhotoOverlay&lt;/a&gt;. It&#039;s nowhere near as good as viewing with a SpaceNavigator, but it may yet prove useful.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Phil]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried <a href="http://panovoyant.blogspot.com/2007/08/ge-photooverlays-with-panoramic-spheres.html" rel="nofollow ugc">combining one of your panoramic spheres with a PhotoOverlay</a>. It&#8217;s nowhere near as good as viewing with a SpaceNavigator, but it may yet prove useful.</p>
<p>Phil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Phil Richards		</title>
		<link>https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2007/08/23/google-earth-gigapan-disappointing/#comment-1837</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil Richards]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 23:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalurban.net/?p=1970#comment-1837</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I gave a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mgifos.demon.co.uk/kml/st_mawes_castle_photooverlay.kml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;spherical pano&lt;/a&gt; the GE PhotoOverlay treatment and experienced the same &#039;flipping&#039; effect, which is rather disappointing.&lt;br/&gt;Incidentally, many thanks for GMapImageCutter, which I used to create the ImagePyramid tiles for the PhotoOverlay, renamed with a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mgifos.demon.co.uk/kml/makepyramid.bat.zip&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;batch file&lt;/a&gt; (just in case anyone else finds it useful).&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Phil]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gave a <a href="http://www.mgifos.demon.co.uk/kml/st_mawes_castle_photooverlay.kml" rel="nofollow ugc">spherical pano</a> the GE PhotoOverlay treatment and experienced the same &#8216;flipping&#8217; effect, which is rather disappointing.<br />Incidentally, many thanks for GMapImageCutter, which I used to create the ImagePyramid tiles for the PhotoOverlay, renamed with a <a href="http://www.mgifos.demon.co.uk/kml/makepyramid.bat.zip" rel="nofollow ugc">batch file</a> (just in case anyone else finds it useful).</p>
<p>Phil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Webmaster		</title>
		<link>https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2007/08/23/google-earth-gigapan-disappointing/#comment-1835</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Webmaster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 20:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalurban.net/?p=1970#comment-1835</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well, it might look dissapointing now, but with the HDView technology, and the Gigapxl layer in Google Earth I guess it will not be long before the GigaPano is offering HDView in a Gigapxl layer or similar.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;John Myrstad - 360-Mediadesign.com]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it might look dissapointing now, but with the HDView technology, and the Gigapxl layer in Google Earth I guess it will not be long before the GigaPano is offering HDView in a Gigapxl layer or similar.</p>
<p>John Myrstad &#8211; 360-Mediadesign.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Andres		</title>
		<link>https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2007/08/23/google-earth-gigapan-disappointing/#comment-1833</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andres]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalurban.net/?p=1970#comment-1833</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Smithee,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Very enlightening post.  I haven&#039;t had a chance to check out any of this stuff myself, but this provides a good frame of reference.  I think the jury is still out...&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Thanks for sharing it on BlinkGeo as well.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;--Andres]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smithee,</p>
<p>Very enlightening post.  I haven&#8217;t had a chance to check out any of this stuff myself, but this provides a good frame of reference.  I think the jury is still out&#8230;</p>
<p>Thanks for sharing it on BlinkGeo as well.</p>
<p>&#8211;Andres</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
