<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Viewing the Credit Crunch Over Time: Motion Graph Mapping	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2008/05/27/test-post-embedding-credit-crunch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2008/05/27/test-post-embedding-credit-crunch/</link>
	<description>Data, Cities, IoT, Writing, Music and Making Things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 13:02:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Rich Treves		</title>
		<link>https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2008/05/27/test-post-embedding-credit-crunch/#comment-2534</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rich Treves]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 13:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalurban.net/?p=1704#comment-2534</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nice work with the graph, I can&#039;t download it but I&#039;ve seen it elsewhere and its a great way to view such data.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;More worryingly, I don&#039;t think you can meaningfully compare choices with time unless you know the sample size.  I saw your map early on and it was a patchwork of colours showing the random response that comes with a low sample size.  As more people added their views the map became more homogeneous.  I suspect this means that the changes you have noted are not down to change in media attention but variations caused by the sample size rising with time.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice work with the graph, I can&#8217;t download it but I&#8217;ve seen it elsewhere and its a great way to view such data.  </p>
<p>More worryingly, I don&#8217;t think you can meaningfully compare choices with time unless you know the sample size.  I saw your map early on and it was a patchwork of colours showing the random response that comes with a low sample size.  As more people added their views the map became more homogeneous.  I suspect this means that the changes you have noted are not down to change in media attention but variations caused by the sample size rising with time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
