<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Google Street View in the UK? / Crowd Sourcing for Commercial Gain	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2008/07/04/google-street-view-in-uk-crowd-sourcing-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2008/07/04/google-street-view-in-uk-crowd-sourcing-2/</link>
	<description>Data, Cities, IoT, Writing, Music and Making Things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 14:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: ayesha b		</title>
		<link>https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2008/07/04/google-street-view-in-uk-crowd-sourcing-2/#comment-2672</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ayesha b]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 14:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalurban.net/?p=1662#comment-2672</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[i read the article on BBC website over the weekend. I am a google fan also, but am concerned that google is taking over...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i read the article on BBC website over the weekend. I am a google fan also, but am concerned that google is taking over&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Keir Clarke		</title>
		<link>https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2008/07/04/google-street-view-in-uk-crowd-sourcing-2/#comment-2671</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keir Clarke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 14:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalurban.net/?p=1662#comment-2671</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I agree - why aren&#039;t Privacy International going after the TV companies and the newspapers who show images of people, houses and cars every day without permission?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The big objection that Privacy International seems to have made is the showing of faces. Google introduced face blurring in street view a couple of weeks ago but for some reason that isn&#039;t being mentioned in the reporting of this.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;MapMaker is another issue - Google&#039;s answer seems to be that they make the data free to access and free to use. There is a counter argument that they don&#039;t actually make the map tiles free to access.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Ed Parsons is apparently now going to attend the State of the Map Conference so hopefully he and openstreetmap can thrash something out that will please all parties.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree &#8211; why aren&#8217;t Privacy International going after the TV companies and the newspapers who show images of people, houses and cars every day without permission?</p>
<p>The big objection that Privacy International seems to have made is the showing of faces. Google introduced face blurring in street view a couple of weeks ago but for some reason that isn&#8217;t being mentioned in the reporting of this.  </p>
<p>MapMaker is another issue &#8211; Google&#8217;s answer seems to be that they make the data free to access and free to use. There is a counter argument that they don&#8217;t actually make the map tiles free to access.</p>
<p>Ed Parsons is apparently now going to attend the State of the Map Conference so hopefully he and openstreetmap can thrash something out that will please all parties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2008/07/04/google-street-view-in-uk-crowd-sourcing-2/#comment-2670</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 11:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalurban.net/?p=1662#comment-2670</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Privacy International come across as pompous asses in that article.&lt;br/&gt;What I&#039;m wondering is, since it&#039;s not allowed to use a photo commercially without consent of everyone in the photo, how do we ever get to see crowd scene photographs in newspapers... Mysterious so it is...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Privacy International come across as pompous asses in that article.<br />What I&#8217;m wondering is, since it&#8217;s not allowed to use a photo commercially without consent of everyone in the photo, how do we ever get to see crowd scene photographs in newspapers&#8230; Mysterious so it is&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
