Comments on: Atlantis Found in Google Earth?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:30:00 +0000

Atlantis is discovered long ago!
http://www.cosmogeology.ge/chapter.htm
http://www.cosmogeology.ge/chapter-25.htm

Global catastrophic plate tectonics 12,500± years’ ego could change isostatic balance between main platforms and slabs. East coastal zone of Northern America and west costal zone of Africa have been sunken. Ten island of Atlantis: Huge Poseidia, two small islands (Pluto, Ammon [mu]) and seven smaller Persephone’s islands had been sunken into the ocean.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:42:00 +0000

To :Seung-Hee Kim: Mikes remarks are reasonable.

How can you judge that the ship tracks are bad and worse than the predicted bathymetry? From thousands of examples I can prove thru comparison with GPS positioned multibeam surveys that the predicted bathymetry is wrong!!!
It is a pity that such product is on Google!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:42:00 +0000

Just two things to add to the fun.
Presuming the survey ship was using SatNav or GPS; why is the grid so erratic? In an area that large, the vessel's towed array was swinging miles off course.
And why do the sonar 'lines' generally track around the hills (or valleys) without crossing over them?

Mike.

By: Seung-hee

Seung-hee — Mon, 23 Feb 2009 00:58:00 +0000

By: Seung-hee

Seung-hee — Sun, 22 Feb 2009 23:25:00 +0000

ftp://topex.ucsd.edu/pub/srtm30_plus/Atlantis_Ship_Tracks.kmz

Please download this file and open with Google Earth 5. You will be able to see the ‘ship track’ right on the area that people think is Atlantis! This Atlantis is an artifact.

Hello guys, my name is Seung-Hee Kim. I’m one of those people who made this bathymetry at Scripps Institution of Oceanography (SIO). You will see the credit on Google Earth 5. Well, I analyzed every single ship track that was used to map the whole ocean. The seafloor that people are saying is Atlantis is from the old version of the bathymetry which contains this ship track that wasn’t edited before. Google used V4.0. If you go to http://topex.ucsd.edu, you will see the new version of the bathymetry that we created last year. In this new version, V5.0, you won’t see the ‘Atlatis’ anymore. In V4.0, we thought that the track wasn’t bad enough for the round of editing. Yet, as we improved the resolution of the bathymetry, we confirmed that this ship track was bad and edited it.

dalcomeboy@gmail.com

This is my email address. Please ask me a question about this ship track if you have any. I might be able to provide you people with the ship name and the date which this sonar data were gathered.

Thank you for reading,

By: Panda_Bear

Panda_Bear — Sat, 21 Feb 2009 04:27:00 +0000

the Mail didn’t spoil the party, just repeating what Google told them. Google is bluffing, they have no clue what the hell it is. Go look around other parts of the ocean floor. There are no other “grids” or anything resembling that very odd shape anywhere else. My guess, it’s real.

By: M@

M@ — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:23:00 +0000

Ha, the Mail spoil the party
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1150846/Hopes-dashed-Google-Ocean-image-lost-city-Atlantis-proves-sort.html

By: M@

M@ — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:04:00 +0000

Woo, found it: 31 15'15.53N 24 15'30.53W

Could it be something imprinted by Google as a joke, or to attract PR, or like A-Z add fake streets to spot copyright breach?

By: M@

M@ — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:59:00 +0000

That is awesome – in the original gravity of the word. ‘The size of Wales’? Wouldn’t that be bigger than any modern city? Do we have coordinates for the feature? I remain skeptical, but this is certainly impressive if true.