<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: New Developments in GIS for Urban Planning: GeoSpatial Today	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2009/03/31/new-developments-in-gis-for-urban/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2009/03/31/new-developments-in-gis-for-urban/</link>
	<description>Data, Cities, IoT, Writing, Music and Making Things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Tomasz		</title>
		<link>https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2009/03/31/new-developments-in-gis-for-urban/#comment-3241</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tomasz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalurban.net/?p=1410#comment-3241</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thats an interesting article though it doesnt mention the existing gap between visioning and analyzing the city (accessing vs processing data). Until we see simulation software get out of metropolitan management and academic niche (especially considering the cost per license) there will not be such fast development in this field as we observe how visualisation techniques are evolving.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I like the part saying that any app can be plugged into any other. I couldnt agree more when I do my job with, what I call, generative modeling- plot data + Lidar + dendrology from GIS get translated by my friends custom app (built within hours) into kml and placed in google earth. Small part of my model is here:&lt;br/&gt;http://www.tomasz.gutowski.w.tkb.pl/kilinskiego-zamkowa.jpg]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats an interesting article though it doesnt mention the existing gap between visioning and analyzing the city (accessing vs processing data). Until we see simulation software get out of metropolitan management and academic niche (especially considering the cost per license) there will not be such fast development in this field as we observe how visualisation techniques are evolving.</p>
<p>I like the part saying that any app can be plugged into any other. I couldnt agree more when I do my job with, what I call, generative modeling- plot data + Lidar + dendrology from GIS get translated by my friends custom app (built within hours) into kml and placed in google earth. Small part of my model is here:<br /><a href="http://www.tomasz.gutowski.w.tkb.pl/kilinskiego-zamkowa.jpg" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.tomasz.gutowski.w.tkb.pl/kilinskiego-zamkowa.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
