<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Making of the Map: John Potters Timelapse	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2010/11/09/making-of-map-john-potters-timelapse-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2010/11/09/making-of-map-john-potters-timelapse-2/</link>
	<description>Data, Cities, IoT, Writing, Music and Making Things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:56:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: John Potter		</title>
		<link>https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2010/11/09/making-of-map-john-potters-timelapse-2/#comment-4058</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Potter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalurban.net/?p=915#comment-4058</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Anonymous:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I used Windows Movie Maker as an editor. &lt;br /&gt;It has a &quot;Speed Up, Double&quot; option. I selected it six times at most. Whether that feature increases the speed exponentially or what, I don&#039;t know. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&#039;ve Googled around some trying to find out the same thing, because I am also curious, but I have not found an answer from an authority I fully trust yet. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sorry not to have a more definitive answer for you.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anonymous:</p>
<p>I used Windows Movie Maker as an editor. <br />It has a &#8220;Speed Up, Double&#8221; option. I selected it six times at most. Whether that feature increases the speed exponentially or what, I don&#8217;t know. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve Googled around some trying to find out the same thing, because I am also curious, but I have not found an answer from an authority I fully trust yet. </p>
<p>Sorry not to have a more definitive answer for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2010/11/09/making-of-map-john-potters-timelapse-2/#comment-4057</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalurban.net/?p=915#comment-4057</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[When you say &#039;doubled six times&#039;, so you mean 6 times original speed, or doubled, then doubled again etc, meaning 64 times original speed? Just trying to get an idea of how long that took...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you say &#8216;doubled six times&#8217;, so you mean 6 times original speed, or doubled, then doubled again etc, meaning 64 times original speed? Just trying to get an idea of how long that took&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Helsinki_Dave		</title>
		<link>https://www.digitalurban.org/blog/2010/11/09/making-of-map-john-potters-timelapse-2/#comment-4056</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Helsinki_Dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 12:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalurban.net/?p=915#comment-4056</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[..surely..this would have been better done in SketchUp ? It seems so much of the process (creating isometric volumes, creating textured surfaces) could have been achieved, with the luxury tweeking the final view - in a basic, cartoon type 3d package. Nice idea to capture it on video (even if it does feel a bit frustrating seeing the poor guy jump through so many hoops to get a result).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>..surely..this would have been better done in SketchUp ? It seems so much of the process (creating isometric volumes, creating textured surfaces) could have been achieved, with the luxury tweeking the final view &#8211; in a basic, cartoon type 3d package. Nice idea to capture it on video (even if it does feel a bit frustrating seeing the poor guy jump through so many hoops to get a result).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
